<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reviews itemIdentifier="BflOggGX1963">
  <review review_id="77">
    <review_id>77</review_id>
    <reviewbody>sdÃÂ¸ÃÂ¦fltÃÂ¥rÃÂ¥otk</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>)ooslkf+0</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Felix</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2002-09-15 00:00:00</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2002-09-15 00:00:00</createdate>
    <stars>5</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="534">
    <review_id>534</review_id>
    <reviewbody>This is a silly and humorous look at the film-making industry with a cast of monkeys. Not really meant to be taken seriously, this is a interesting look into 70's filmmaking.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Very Cute!</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Spuzz</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2002-12-04 00:00:00</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2002-12-04 00:00:00</createdate>
    <stars>3</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="5384">
    <review_id>5384</review_id>
    <reviewbody>As written below:

"a silly and humorous look at the film-making industry with a cast of monkeys. Not really meant to be taken seriously"

Yes, indeedy!</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Spuzz's review is cool!</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>-FP-</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2003-07-26 22:51:55</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2003-07-26 22:51:55</createdate>
    <stars>4</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="5461">
    <review_id>5461</review_id>
    <reviewbody>To paraphrase Keitel in, "Mean Streets," "He knew. Calvin had it down." Yes, a very honest and refreshing look at the industry I used to work in.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>First honest look inside film production!</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Ruki</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2003-08-01 20:58:23</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2003-08-01 20:58:23</createdate>
    <stars>3</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="19207">
    <review_id>19207</review_id>
    <reviewbody>This film, made by an industrial film company, would have us believe that all of the technical jobs in film production, as well as writing and directing, are done by chimps. On second thought, that explains a lot of the dreck Hollywood has foisted on us over the years. Monsters Crash the Pajama Party was only able to hint at this scandal, but as usual, ephemeral films tell us what is really going on.
Ratings: Camp/Humor Value: *****. Weirdness: *****. Historical Interest: *****. Overall Rating: *****.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>So That Explains A*P*E!</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Christine Hennig</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2004-08-20 17:12:15</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2004-08-20 17:12:15</createdate>
    <stars>5</stars>
  </review>
  <review review_id="36436">
    <review_id>36436</review_id>
    <reviewbody>This film could have easily gotten a 4 or even a five from me, the premise was thier (a bunch of monkeys working in the film industry) but it's brought down by one main factor: thier are large gaps of time between the different scenes.This is unacceptable, and I'm surprised know one at the studio where this was produced did anything about it. Still you can't go wrong with monkys it's an intresting premise but not very well executed.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>utiyhhfi.gujhfhlk</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Karma Hawk</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2005-03-27 17:17:14</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2005-03-27 17:17:14</createdate>
    <stars>3</stars>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>Not terribly amusing look at film making that gets a boost from an adorable cast of chimps and some great old office furniture.</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>Hooray for chimps!</reviewtitle>
    <stars>3</stars>
    <reviewer>Venckman</reviewer>
    <createdate>2005-07-05 20:35:45</createdate>
    <reviewdate>2005-07-05 20:35:45</reviewdate>
  </review>
  <review>
    <reviewbody>###############dr \ggsd;l' klre]rgk</reviewbody>
    <reviewtitle>gjrgkrg- 00kgr--g0rgo@34t5y -b</reviewtitle>
    <reviewer>Mr.</reviewer>
    <reviewdate>2007-06-30 16:02:08</reviewdate>
    <createdate>2006-06-17 03:31:08</createdate>
    <stars>3</stars>
  </review>
  <info>
    <num_reviews>8</num_reviews>
    <avg_rating>3.63</avg_rating>
  </info>
</reviews>
